• Het proces van Nuremberg was propaganda, wie waren de échte misdadigers ?

    Onderstaand artikel duidt duidelijk op de oneerlijkheid van het proces van Nuremberg na Wereldoorlog 2, bijna iedereen die ik sprak die de oorlog heeft meegemaakt vertelden me dat niet alleen de Duitsers moesten terechtstaan en dat er achter de oorlog een grotere macht zat, namelijk 'de bankiers van de wereld'.  Ook nu met de huidige economische crisis is het duidelijk dat er crisis is voor velen en dat er helemaal geen crisis voor enkele anderen die aan de touwtjes trekken, er wordt mondiaal vuil spel gespeeld en dat is allicht altijd zo geweest, maar tegenwoordig worden de oppossanten meer dan ooit de mond gesnoerd.  Als Barack Obama zei :'It's time for change' dan had hij gelijk, de VS en Europa zitten in een mondiale crisis, de VN wil de vrijheid van de Amerikanen sterk beknotten, de president van de VS is niet wie hij zegt te zijn. Niet voor niets laten media tegenwoordig een clip zien van Obama met als opschrift : 'Who is that man ?'  Is hij de duistere pion in een duister schaakspel met mensen als Söros aan zet ?

    In the public’s mind, the war trials following World War II demonstrated that evil must be vanquished and punished. But the Nuremberg Trials were simply a propaganda showcase. In reality, the only difference between the “good guys” and the “bad guys” was that the “good guys” had more guns.

    What the people of the world did not see and still do not understand is that the real issues of World War II were never allowed to come up for public debate — certainly not at the Nuremberg Trials. The issue was that both sides prosecuted the war with paper money.

    What are the facts? The facts are that both combatants were equally guilty of promoting esoteric warfare on their own populations as well as on each other. Someone(s) who wanted to initiate a new world human drama lined up and supplied both sides. The cost of human life was incidental to the money creators. But if there is a “cause,” people will die and sacrifice their own flesh.

    Both the United States and Germany should have been on trial at Nuremberg, Germany in 1945 for war crimes. Oh, the German high command was guilty all right — but no less so than the U.S. or British high command.

    It is not debatable that both sides sent millions of their own young soldiers to an early death. Both sides also killed millions of civilians. And the allied powers, fighting ostensibly to keep Europe free from Nazism, condemned millions of Eastern Europeans to years of suffering the oppression of communism under Russia’s boot heel.

    Forget all the propaganda and all the blame and consider the honest answer as to who was at fault on both sides. Do we want the honest answer? Can we stand the light of day?

    The people who caused the great world wars and all wars that have brought death and suffering to millions of people were the central bankers in other countries and the Federal Reserve Bank in the United States.

    Central banks create paper money and credit for government and politicians to spend for war and their socialist agenda. All of the money and credit now crushing the American people was created by the U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve (which is neither Federal, nor does it hold reserves). It is owned, as it has been since its beginning, by a few bankster families in the United States and Europe.

    Your local banker is probably innocent in this scheme. I doubt if one person in 1,000 — and that includes most bank employees — has a clue as to how money is created by banks.

    Banks don’t have loads of paper money in their vaults. When they start to make a customer loan, they just create the money with a bookkeeping entry. It costs the bank nothing, but the customer has to pay interest.

    Bankers big and small love this system, as do politicians. This gives them a silent and unfair advantage over the people.

    Paper money and credit are the licenses for all the evil that the human mind of man can conjure up and create. Central bankers have demonstrated in the past 100 years that with a stroke of a computer digit they can create trillions of dollars as easily as they can $1. Yes, they create these dollars out of nothing, but you have to work for your dollars.

    Printing-press money is the means and motivation for endless wars and endless death and suffering, courtesy of the banksters. This is banker blood money and with it they devalue all the money in circulation. It is an insidious confiscation of wealth that not one person in 1 million understands or is even aware of.

    Devaluation of the currency is the prime and silent purpose of banker-created money. Even at this hour, devaluation is impoverishing Americans by reducing and diluting the purchasing power of their money. This goes on all the time, even while we sleep.

    You can’t bury your money deep enough to save it from the money creators. It is all very simple. The more money the banksters create, the less yours is worth.

    The point of this article is that World War I, World War II and any war that we can think of — including the wars in the Mideast — would not last more than a few days without the banksters creating money to prosecute war. Wars have to be funded.

    Bankster-created money is the blood of war as well as the impoverishment of the people. All central bankers create the money for war and death.

    Paper money appears in the absence of the gold standard. Banksters and politicians hate the gold standard because the gold standard disciplines them and the bureaucrats to the rule of law.

    Banksters create the money for war and death. The discipline of the gold standard would have prevented all the wars of the past 100 years. Millions of soldiers have died for nothing, as have millions of civilians.

    Did your history book mention this?

    (bron B.Livingston, absolute rights, usa)

  • Verkrachtingen door moslims systematisch verzwegen in Europa.

    Er zijn de regelmatige berichten over katholieke priesters die kinderen (zouden) misbruiken, maar aan de systematische aanrandingen door moslims wordt er een heel andere toon aangeslagen zoals onderstaand artikel uit de VS duidelijk maakt:

    For years there have been reports on blogs, personal testimonials and the like, about what looked like a literal epidemic of rape by Muslim men of both women and children, especially in northern European nations where the Muslim immigrant population is high.


    But the disturbing reports rarely rose to the level that would make the general population aware of the dangers that were becoming evident. After all, such a report would be blasted for attacking Islam and discriminating against Muslims.


    Until now, when a case from the United Kingdom has proven so egregious it could not be ignored.


    The BBC reported that nine men were convicted of child sexual exploitation in Greater Manchester, after they had “groomed” girls as young as 13. But even there, the report identified the convicts only as “Asian” while revealing their victims were white.


    The Guardian took one more step and labeled them as “Pakistani,” but it took a lesser-known online news site, The Salfordian, to identify the suspects as “Muslim men” who “plied girls as young as 13 with drink and drugs so they could use them for sex ‘several times a day.’”


    Now, the subject that long has been ignored or suppressed finally may be getting the attention a major crime wave would deserve, regardless of the political correctness of the facts.


    Officials at The Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank dedicated to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report, have spoken up.


    In a commentary just days ago, the organization noted that the three-month trial where the “nine Muslim men were found guilty of raping dozens of British children” revealed that “police and social workers in northern England repeatedly refuse to investigate Muslim pedophile gangs: they said they are afraid of being called racist.”


    “The disturbing details that emerged during the trial have opened yet another chapter in a long-running debate about multiculturalism in Britain, where many say that political correctness has gone too far,” the foundation said. “Less than a month after the trial in Liverpool ended … it emerged that social workers in the city of Rotherham, also in northern England, had known for six years that a teenage mother (identified as Child S) who was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani men who had used her for sex, was at clear risk from predatory Muslim gangs.”


    The city “Safeguarding Children Board” has reviewed the case, but “key politically incorrect passages which reveal that they had known she was at particular risk from ‘Asian men’ (Muslim men) were blocked out with black lines,” the foundation charged. “The council went to court in an attempt to suppress the hidden information after an uncensored copy of the report was leaked to a British newspaper, but the legal action was eventually abandoned. The uncensored report confirmed that Child S had pursued dealings with 15 different agencies, and identified ‘numerous missed opportunities’ to protect her; observers believe the agencies failed to do so be because they did not want to be branded as racist.”


    The foundation has identified a series of additional incidents where the appearance of special privilege was evident, and they all included one common factor: Islam.


    *According to Gatestone, it was in Leicester where a “gang of Somali Muslim women” assaulted and nearly killed a non-Muslim passer-by but walked free when a “political correct” judge said that as Muslims they were “not used to being drunk.”

    *In London, two Muslims repeatedly raped a women but had their sentences reduced after “politically correct judges” ruled they were not “dangerous.”

    *In Wiltshire, police pulled over a driver and ordered him to remove the flag of England from his vehicle, because it could be “deemed racist and offensive to Muslim immigrants.”

    *In Manchester, police arrested a 14-year-old girl who asked a teacher if she could switch tables, as the five other students at her table were speaking Urdu and she couldn’t understand. She was booked on suspicion of a “section five racial public order offense.”

    But regarding the rape epidemic, the unusually blunt Salfordian report on the nine Muslims convicted took to the editorial page for just a minute.


    “As we’ve come to expect the media refers to them as just ‘Asian’ rather than Muslim and online comments haven’t been allowed because we can’t upset the Muslim invaders,” the report said.


    Because of the circumstances – to identify Muslim rapists individuals have to be identified by their religion – statistics about the problem appear to be almost nonexistent.


    So, many of the reports of rape and assault remain below the radar, reaching only to the level of forums such as the Asian Image, where a woman posted a first-person testimony about being assaulted by a Muslim imam.


    “I am angry that a man was allowed to get away with abusing a little girl for four years, and nobody picked up on it, my parents did not pick up on my mood swings, from being quiet to being angry. My abuser was supposedly a man of faith, a man of standing, a man we trusted, someone who had authority in the community. … He took away my childhood, he took me to the dark place, where I cannot get out of,” her tormented testimony explains.


    But several better-known blogs have tried, with The Gates of Vienna posting a testimony from Paul Weston of the British Freedom Party.


    He said, “The liberal/left need to take a long hard look themselves in the wake of the appalling Muslim gang rape revelations. I don’t blame the Muslims particularly, they are simply living by the 7th century rules of a desert warrior, but I do blame the liberal/left for quite literally enabling the brutal rape and violation of our children.


    All you liberal/leftists are complicit in these crimes against humanity. You could have stopped it years ago, but you deliberately chose not to,” he said.


    “The BBC, The Guardian, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Child Protection Agency, the Politically Correct Police Service: I accuse you and the entire liberal establishment of deliberately covering up the multiple rapes and ruined lives of countless vulnerable young girls because of your utterly immoral and obscene attitude toward your own people, and your cowardly appeasement of a religious and political ideology that sanctions the violation of non-Muslim females.


    “Even now, when the facts are presented before us, you tell us it is not a Muslim problem, nor apparently a racial problem, unless of course you happen to be a vaguely all-encompassing Asian. But no amount of politically correct liberal/left evasion can disguise reality, and reality confirms the overwhelming culture of these pedophile rapists to be Islamic, and the overwhelming race of the majority of the victims to be indigenous British girls,” he said.


    Warming up to the subject he cited Muslim rape epidemics in Oslo, Malmo, Copenhagen and Sydney.


    “I think we can safely say, then, that it is indeed a matter of one particular religion, Islam, rather than the liberal/left’s obscene portrayal of it as simply as Asian problem, and it is indeed a racial problem when the victims are overwhelmingly native Europeans,” he said.


    He said the problem has been identified in 13 towns and cities in Britain “and it now turns out the authorities have known about it since the early 1990s. In other words, possibly thousands of vulnerable and underage British girls have been raped and both physically and psychologically damaged for life, with at least two taking their own lives…”


    Jihad Watch also has documented the ongoing dangers.


    The report suggested the Islamics were just following Islam: “Their Islamic supremacist contempt for non-Muslims as the ‘worst of creatures’ (Quran 89.6), whom Muslims are bound by Allah to treat with harshness (Quran 48:29; 9:123).”


    The Sheikyermami website continues to document the epidemic, with headlines including ” Immigrants rape girl after Quran classes,” “British girls gang-raped as part of Eid Celebration,” and “Illegal immigrant raped young woman three years after judge ordered him to be depoated.”


    Atlasshrugs has documented the attacks in Sweden, and the MuslimRapeWave cites cases from all over and coordinates protests.


    One report there describes how a Muslim taxi driver raped and killed a passenger, then hid her body so “his community” wouldn’t find out.


    Some of the reports on the issue date back a decade, with one at Jihad Watch took direct testimony from an interrogation of a rapist.


    There, Muslim terrorist Ramzi Hashem Abed was being asked about his activities:


    He was asked, “Tell me how many rape and kidnapping operations were carried out. My information says that the kidnapped women were university students or daughters of famous people. You raped them and got money for it, and if they were not slaughtered afterwards…. Did this really happen?”


    “Yes, it did,” Abed said.


    The interrogator asked, “Is this Jihad – raping women? Is this Jihad?”


    Abed: “It is because they collaborated with the Americans.”


    Interrogator: “That’s why they were raped?”


    Abed: “Yes.”


    Interrogator: “A student who is simply going to her university is kidnapped, raped, and then slaughtered?! This was an American collaborator?!”


    Commentator Michelle Malkin also has raised the issue, citing reports that “the gang rapes of Muslim girls and women” are on the rise in France.


    “The culprits are Islamic fundamentalist thugs,” the report said.






    The Scandanavian epidemic was described in a YouTube CBN video:

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------




  • The life of man (David Hume)

    The life of man is of no greater importance to the universe than that of an oyster.   David Hume (1711-1776).

    Het merkwaardige is echter dat de mens zichzelf als zo oneindig belangrijk ervaart, nee een universum zonder ons is ondenkbaar stellen ze, maar niets is minder waar. De korte tijd dat Homo Sapiens over deze blauwe globe wandelt is een fractie van enkele seconden op de schaal van de paleontologie.  Op deze korte tijd hebben we al het één en ander gepresteerd: uitroeien van andere levende wezens, opsouperen van fossiele brandstoffen die miljoenen jaren nodig hadden om te ontstaan, vernietigen van ons eigenste biotoop en last but not least: de planeet overbevolken als een echte plaag. Maar in het grote schema van het alles en niets is het echter een fait divers. Op een gegeven ogenblik zal de zon niet meer opkomen voor ons mensen, want de tijd achterhaalt alles, ook onze planeet en onze soort. De zon brandt op, ze zet uit en ... weg aarde, finished. Ook al zien we de kans om via ruimtevaart te ontkomen als soort, dat zal dat slechts de zwanenzang zijn van de mens.  Als we de snelheid van het licht niet kunnen overbruggen (tegen het principe van de relativiteitstheorie) (de theorie zegt dat een object met een massa niet gelijk aan nul (zoals een photon) een oneindige energie moet toegevoerd krijgen om de lichtsnelheid te halen en dat is onmogelijk.) hebben we een serieus probleem, want de meeste leefbare planeten zitten op enkele miljoenen lichtjaren hier vandaan ... met wat fantasie is het al snel duidelijk dat de techniek ons niet gaat redden en dat de maakbaarheid van de wereld een illusie is. 


  • Regelmatige updates op

    Er worden regelmatige updates gedaan op de website van het filosofisch dagboekje... 

    website filosofisch dagboek.in.jpg