• Groen, vers van het internet geplukt.

    Een andere kant van de groene beweging, neem bvb het klimaatdebat dat wordt nu gezien zoals een radicale godsdienst of het begrip democratie.  Het broeikasteffect is een dogma geworden zoals de multiculturele samenleving, het zijn dogma's van de linkerzijde. Maar in Europa zijn het vaak dogma's van zowel rechts als links geworden, vraag is echter wat is rechts in Europa ?  Volgens mij een verzwakt links.  Zelfs wat extreem rechts wordt genoemd kan de test niet meer doorstaan, die zijde wordt sterk gehinderd door de verlinksing van de bevolking in Europa, gepamperd door de sociale zekerheid. De Staat staat voor alles van de wieg tot in het graf, dus is ook de Staat allesregulerend en alleswetend. Kinderen opvoeden is voor de Staat, wat ik mag zeggen en denken is tegenwoordig ook al weggelegd voor de Staat en bepaalde idioten denken dan ook dat de staat zelfs alles mag regelen wat in uw kamer of woning gebeurd. Bepaalde besturen denken te moeten regelen of je a een konijn mag hebben of b) niet, zelfs roken gaat men trachten te verbieden in huis, ze controleren je gangen via camera's, je DNA, je uitspraken, je gedrag : Big Brother over de ganse lengte.  Wie wil zo leven ? Het wordt tijd dat de common sense terugkomt in de maatschappij, want anders komt er zowiezo meer verzet van mensen met verstand. Zelfs in het zo homogene NASA is er nu onrust ontstaan over dissidentie van mensen met een hoog IQ tegen het broeikasteffect en klimaatregeling.  Het bedrog is steeds dezelfde, men herhaalt het bedrog van de multiculturele staat haast voor 99%, alle bewijzen die hun theorie niet ondersteunen worden verzwegen, geridiculiseerd of als bedrog afgestempeld, kiest men de strijd dan gat men de persoon stigmatiseren zoals een school bully zou doen. Vrijheid van mening is prachtig, maar anno 2012 is ze haast onbestaande. Soms breekt het wel eens zuur op zoals de aanval op de republikeinse kandidaat Mitt Romney door het Obama kamp, daar wordt Obama steeds getoond met de presidentiële hond (witte huis traditie) en Romney die wordt afgestempeld als dierenbeul, omdat hij zijn hond op het dak bevestigde, nu blijkt dat Obama in Indonesië hond gegeten heeft zijn de rollen omgekeerd, kijk maar op Twitter daarvoor. De pers in Europa is ook al zeer bekrompen en geeft geen objectief nieuws weer.  Vrije pers is onbestaande, de berichtgeving is steeds op dezelfde manier gekleurd. In de VS is voor elke linkse krant een rechtse of conservatieve tegenhanger. Neem New York met de NY Times, NY Post, New Yorker, NY Daily News ....

    Enkele uitspraken van de groene beweging:

    “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.” – Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace.

    “What we’ve got to do in energy conservation is try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, to have approached global warming as if it is real means energy conservation, so we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” – Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-CO)

    “We have wished, we eco-freaks, for a disaster or for a social change to come and bomb us into Stone Age, where we might live like Indians in our valley, with our localism, our appropriate technology, our gardens, our homemade religion—guilt-free at last!” – Steward Brand, writing in the Earth Catalog.

    “Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental.” – Dave Forman, founder of Earth First. (100 % waar !!!)

    “The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing….This is not to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run.” – An editorial in The Economist.

    en als tegenbalans:

    “The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.” –Paul Johnson, historian

    And, finally, this warning from the President of the Czech Republic, Vaclac Klaus: “They hate us, the humans, they consider us selfish and sinful creatures who must be controlled by them. I used to live in a similar world —called communism— and I know that it led to the worst environmental damage the world has ever experienced.”

    Neem vooral de uitspraak van Vaclav Klaus voor waar en kijk naar de voormalige USSR, want dat is het model dat in de achterhoofden spookt van veel socialisten en ander rood grut.

    Communism-Environmentalism.jpg

  • Turkije weg van Ata Turk.

    Increasingly the age of Ataturk (separation of mosque and state) is but an historical blip.

    "PM Erdogan: The Term 'Moderate Islam' Is Ugly And Offensive; There Is No Moderate Islam; Islam Is Islam,"

    PM Erdogan commented on the term “moderate Islam”, often used in the West to describe AKP and said, ‘These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.”

    As islamization goes, so goes gender apartheid, honor killings, misogyny ..... and it's not Islamist (ridiculous word), it's Islamic.

    With the Islamists’ Rise to Power, Turkey Became the World’s Leading Hotspot of Honour Killings M. Khan (hat tip David W)

    To educated Muslims, honor killing has nothing to do with Islam and Turkey is the only "role model" Islamic country, because in all other Muslim countries, honor killing occurs. Unfortunately, after the Islamists came to power in 2002 and opened the gates of gradual Islamization of Turkey, after 8 decades of strict secular rule, Turkey has risen to be the world's "number one honor killing country", with a killing rate 5 times higher than that of Pakistan, known to be notorious for honor killing.


    The Quran and hadiths prohibit adultery, apostasy, fornication, and homosexuality etc. And Muslim societies, since the days of Prophet Muhammad, have punished such offenders, normally by killing them, in perfect harmony with sanctions of the Quran, Sunnah and the Sharia.

    Victims of Islam's honor violence


    Taliban honor killing of young lovers
    Gruesome video: People with weak hearts and heart ailments
    must not watch

    honor killing Ameneh-Bahrami-Iran-acid-attack-victim
    Haseena-Hussain-acid-attack -- honor killing victim
    Fakhra-acid-attack-victim-pakistan
    aira-liaqat-acid-attack-victim Bashiran-Bibi-acid-attack-victim
     

    In civilized societies, these are not deemed crimes, because those actions do not directly harm another person, whatsoever. The rationale for punishing such offenders in Muslim societies (and in some others) has been that adultery brings shame to the husband and to the offender’s family; apostasy from Islam insults to the Islamic faith or to the Muslim community; etc. And to wipe out such shame and insult, the offenders are killed, generally by family members – frequently the father, brothers and husband, with the mother and sisters often joining in.

    Stoning to death, lashing (which frequently leads to death), shooting to death and mob-lynching are common methods of honor violence. The victims are even buried alive in some cases. In countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh, those targeted for honor violence by husbands and jilted male lovers are frequently burned and disfigured by throwing acids at them.

    With Muslim immigrants, the tradition of killing such offenders also came to the West. Muslim immigrants have committed such extra-judicially killings in countries of Europe, America, Canada, and Australia in recent years. Authorities in Western countries have long ignored such killings, which Muslim communities have often passed on as suicides. As the Muslim populations swelled in the West with increasing religiosity, frequency of such extra-judicial killings in Muslim communities also increased to such an extent that authorities could not ignore those killings any more. And adamant against linking any negativity to the religion of Islam, they coined the term "honor killing" to classify this brand of grievous crimes as something cultural.

    Islamic countries, under pressure to observe the rule of law and human rights of their citizens from the UN and Western countries in recent decades, also cannot pass on such extra-judicial killings as a part of their religious affair or as their societal norm any more. So, Human Rights Organizations, more watchful than ever of the violations of human rights around the world, also record and classify these extra-judicial murders as honor killing.

    Honor killing doesn’t occur in Islamic societies alone. Some 15,000 individuals, mostly women, are honor-killed worldwide every year. And nearly 90% of them occur in Muslim communities. Since Muslims constitute about 20% of the world population, they are 40-45 times more prone to honor killing than non-Muslims.

    Pakistan, Afghanistan, Jordan, Syria, and other Arab Islamic countries are the leading hotspots of honor-killings in the Muslim world. Recently disposed dead-bodies of a 15-year-old boy and 12-year-old girl, burned with acid, were recovered from a wasteland in the Ghazni province of Afghanistan. The young couple – apparently lovers – were suspected of being killed in honor violence, because the deeply religious Afghan society does not approve romantic relationships between unmarried men and women in consonance with the Quran’s prohibition of fornication. When this story was posted in islam-watch.org, Muslims quickly attempted to distance the religion of Islam from the horrible crime. One reader commented:

    "There is nothing like this behavior that is condoned in Islam and to try and insinuate such is a crime itself, and shameful. Maybe if the parents did their job bring up their kids they would not have ventured down that path, but the parents themselves are obviously disturbed individuals who should be punished by the law."

    See how these deceptive Muslims contradict nakedly. He claims that Islam doesn’t approve the punishment, and immediately he says, it’s a punishable crime, but the young couple’s parents should have been punished, not them. He does not only contradict himself, he also wants to play God over Allah, who commands punishment to fornicators themselves, not their parent.

    Yet other Muslims, to distance Islam from such barbaric crimes, would say "Afghanistan is hardly the "role model" [Islamic country]."

    And if you ask back, which is a "role model" Islamic country, they will answer: "Turkey", with the addendum: "Even though it’s secular but Muslim none the less!"

    Bron: Atla Shrugs, Pamela Geller.